Plesk Antispam Techniques?
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:45 pm
Do you guys use/don't use Plesk's SPF, DomainKeys, RBLs, SpamAssassin, Submission port for antispam? Why?
For example we use bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org, dsn.rfc-ignorant.org and sbl.spamhaus.org for RBL block. I found that a pair of our clients IPs are in Spamhaus's pbl list (and as you know Plesk doesn't honor smtp-auth for rbl checks), so zen.spamhaus.org isn't an option. For SPF we use "include:spf.trusted-forwarder.org", "a/24 mx/24 ptr". We have a problems with that, because from time to time clients use their ISP's SMTP server with some public e-mail service addresses. We're looking intro disabling SPF check in near future - more headache than real help. Just need of one last drop/client call. SpamAssassin alone is very resource hungry and easily tricked by spammers last months, so it's only good as secondary level check. And we don't use Submission port for known reasons.
For example we use bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org, dsn.rfc-ignorant.org and sbl.spamhaus.org for RBL block. I found that a pair of our clients IPs are in Spamhaus's pbl list (and as you know Plesk doesn't honor smtp-auth for rbl checks), so zen.spamhaus.org isn't an option. For SPF we use "include:spf.trusted-forwarder.org", "a/24 mx/24 ptr". We have a problems with that, because from time to time clients use their ISP's SMTP server with some public e-mail service addresses. We're looking intro disabling SPF check in near future - more headache than real help. Just need of one last drop/client call. SpamAssassin alone is very resource hungry and easily tricked by spammers last months, so it's only good as secondary level check. And we don't use Submission port for known reasons.