Plesk announced it's own email security product recently (was this the reason why MagicSpam got ported from extensions?). We'll give it a try but won't let go of MagicSpam. I reckon we can run both as MagisSpam works "outside" of Plesk. Is my assumption right?
Pleskian
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:19 pm
- Forum: General Discussions and Support Questions
- Topic: MagicSpam and Plesk Email Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 19198
- Mon May 14, 2018 3:21 am
- Forum: General Discussions and Support Questions
- Topic: HELO argument
- Replies: 9
- Views: 77834
Re: HELO argument
Hi
Amount of HELO rejections increased dramatically.
Now disabled the resolve_helo_domain rule
our dns servers ns1.etcnet.fi, ns2.etcnet.fi, ns3.etcnet.fi, ns6.gandi.net
We're running
CentOs 7 64 bit
Plesk Onyx 17.8.11
mailserver Postfix (IMAP Dovecot)
Amount of HELO rejections increased dramatically.
Now disabled the resolve_helo_domain rule
our dns servers ns1.etcnet.fi, ns2.etcnet.fi, ns3.etcnet.fi, ns6.gandi.net
We're running
CentOs 7 64 bit
Plesk Onyx 17.8.11
mailserver Postfix (IMAP Dovecot)
- Fri May 11, 2018 1:11 am
- Forum: General Discussions and Support Questions
- Topic: HELO argument
- Replies: 9
- Views: 77834
HELO argument
Started to get a lot of rejected mails today, even Google was involved:
550 5.7.0 HELO argument [mail-ua0-f181.google.com] is missing a DNS entry. See http://spamauditor.org/best-practices/r ... dentifier/ for more information. Protection provided by MagicSpam 2.0.16-1 http://www.magicspam.com
550 5.7.0 HELO argument [mail-ua0-f181.google.com] is missing a DNS entry. See http://spamauditor.org/best-practices/r ... dentifier/ for more information. Protection provided by MagicSpam 2.0.16-1 http://www.magicspam.com